[ home ] [ 0sint / art / b / biz / ck / coz / fc / fit / g / h / his / int / k / lit / pol / qa / r / sh / sig / t / tardpol / tv / v / x ] [ overboard ] [ donate ] [ rules ] [ privacy ] [ dmca ] [ status ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Catalog
Options
Subject
Comment
Captcha (NOT Case Sensitive)
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28]
| Catalog

Get New Thread Alerts for /pol/ and /b/: https://t.me/frens_chan

File: 1649989636821.jpg (13.05 KB, 281x179, _09c62fde3787322ec0728004….jpg)

aff63 No.3571[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Questions/Posts That Don't Deserve Their Own Thread.

Content which follows this format belongs here and will be reposted here if it isn’t:

• "Redpill me on [x topic]"

• "Is [person/place/thing] redpilled?"

• Single sentence questions about a topic

• Single sentence threads.
128 posts and 54 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

abba2 No.14267

>>4462
This is true, you can only post faggot.



File: 1653114481221.jpg (650.84 KB, 1080x2408, Screenshot_20220520-232447….jpg)

c4542 No.14390[Reply]

… and what are the political implications of making blended conditions to unconditionally accept "sexual" acts without explicit conditions?

to me sounds like unconditionally gay porn. where is the limit?

rip.
14 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

bd8f1 No.14543

>>14534
The problem with free speech is that it assumes a bright and civil populace who respect and value one another. That isn't the world we live in any longer. We live in the racial jungle. What can be weaponized will be weaponized.

4f77e No.14544

>>14406
You linked a porn site on a political board

b299a No.14545

>>14390
Buck breaking kek



File: 1650729503742.jpeg (310.11 KB, 1024x1024, ima_d7c0f31.jpeg)

dbb55 No.7699[Reply]

How can we fuck with people who make shit like this?
>actual book targeted to 4-5 year olds
post ideas below in the thread
32 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

de772 No.14533

>>7699
If you didn't know any better, after looking through this book you'd come to the conclusion that same-race relationships are abnormal.

de772 No.14537

>>8375
You're probably already aware, but just for the sake of any lurkers, the reason is because women are much more susceptible to being influenced by marketing and propaganda. So if you want to promote race-mixing it's far more cost-effective to target the women rather than the men. Plus there's the added sadistic element of causing consternation in the men.

80362 No.14542

>>14335
>patents for altering brainwaves via external means, these patents have been around for a long time.
no, it's ideological

>are we all really so mk-ultra-ed into being pacificistic lay-abouts?

yes fren :(



File: 1653173666544.png (3.24 MB, 1288x1450, v8rG8AOKHpUG.png)

3d984 No.14527[Reply]

Growth of Patriot Front

a26c9 No.14538

I'll bump this for you. But, I was wondering because I'm not educated on the grassroots movements for the Right… Are they glowies?

4a1f3 No.14541

>>14538
Yes, everyone is a glowie, even your mom. The only solution is to lay down and die. Glowies are more akin to God than agencies in that they are omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent.



File: 1651372174062.png (14.5 KB, 778x184, 2022-05-01_05-27.png)

d3940 No.9985[Reply]

https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/IPIP-BFFM/
Let's datamine bros.
Unlike other bozo tests this actually measures something. Post ur results frens, maybe we'll have some conclusions in the end, get a mean or average chan poster
14 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

e657b No.14531

File: 1653174777517.png (1.87 KB, 520x122, BIG5-graphic.png)

>>9985
My stats

e407e No.14535

>>14526
Eysenck was a jew too but funnily enough his work is still relatively valuable. I can't say the same for people like Freud.

a32ec No.14540

File: 1653177057810.jpeg (310.78 KB, 1931x430, E24EFA54-3F88-401A-9D20-1….jpeg)

For what it is worth.



File: 1651027676711.jpg (200.07 KB, 1024x693, 1651025592424m.jpg)

c5a16 No.9026[Reply]

Even NASA says so:

>Pipe Great Lakes water to Phoenix? It's likely, NASA scientist says


>States surrounding the Great Lakes have a recurring nightmare about proposals to siphon off water for parched areas in U.S. or other countries. So they might be staggered by suggestions from NASA scientist Jay Famiglietti, who said a water pipeline from the lakes to cities like Phoenix was "part of our future.”


>Famiglietti, a hydrologist and senior water scientist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, was in Cleveland recently for a lecture. In the interview with Ideas, he said that "from a quantity perspective you might imagine that there’s a giant bullseye that can be seen from space that’s sitting above the Great Lakes. Meaning: It’s a target area in a sense for the rest of the country.


>"Because there’s so much fresh water, you can imagine that 50 years from now … there might actually be a pipeline that brings water from the Great Lakes to Phoenix. I think that’s part of our future.” Famiglietti said such initiatives are needed to address a global water shortage.


>States surrounding the Great Lakes have jealously guarded the vast water resource. After all, the lakes hold 20 percent of the world's fresh water, and those states (and the government of Canada) realize the value in a world that is increasingly faced with shortages.


http://www.greatlakestoday.org/post/pipe-great-lakes-water-phoenix-its-likely-nasa-scientist-says

Sharing is caring, lakefags.
38 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

fd8ed No.14474

Wouldn't it just be easier to develop halophyte crops and use existing saltwater aquifers?

dd6da No.14515

>>11475
>4chan
rong site niqqer

dd6da No.14530

>>9026
A pipeline that long would be impossible to guard from ecofascists who would absolutely be in the right to destroy it



File: 1652820124571.jpg (37.28 KB, 352x493, Giovanni_Gentile_sgr.jpg)

690e5 No.13753[Reply]

I believe it is insulting to anybody's intelligence here by implying that intellectualism is intelligent at all. No one here is against intelligence like so many believe, in typical retarded fashion, but intellectualism… which is a sickness of the intellect, as was described by Giovanni Gentile. Intellectuals are stupid and deluded; it goes without saying, really. The fact of the matter is, they can't segregate themselves from their pitiful existence.
I don't insult myself by ever believing I could have an intelligent discussion with them. Note once again that I said intelligent, not intellectual wanking. Intellectualism is exactly that… masturbation, it makes them feel good but in the long run it is not productive, while no one else wants to know about it.
I am precisely anti-intellectualism because I am a man of action, intellectualism is passive. When I think of intellectualism, the first person I think of is Karl Marx.
>"Karl Marx, who spent most of his life in the reading room of the British Museum Library, probably came as little into contact with nature as it was possible to do and still stay alive. The result was that his philosophy ignored everything not human absolutely completely. He was aware (just) that food came from the country. He was aware that there must be some people out there somewhere who grew it. It was his object to rescue these imaginary people from what he called 'the idiocy of rural life'. What is that to the idiocy of spending all your life in the British Museum Library?" - John Seymour
The second person I think of is this person I know who is the archetype for the leftist mindset that was described infallibly by the Unabomber. The old men were men of action, men of honour into battle; civilization today sends the intellectuals forward to battle human nature. Intellectuals are the murderers of masculinity, the killers of concrete thought and the butchers of heroism.
I'm also anti-academic; especially the current state that it is in. This is mainly to thank precisely because of intellectualists who propose and dictate popular social issues and so-called solutions, ALL OF WHICH NEVER FUCKING WORK, yet they are never held accountable when these methods do not work and we are the ones who have to constantly go into our pockets to pay for this crap. Yep, we're paying for this leftist indoctrination and all of this 'diversity', economically and every other way.
1. ForPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
5 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

2b295 No.14508

the problem is jews assuming the title of intellectual. just as they appropriate everything else that has a bit of steam, to corrupt it.

the problem is jews, jews, jews!!!
its in their dna!!! evil!
you can get rid of every tool they have, address every argument, dispel every lie, and they will just find another way to expel their inner misery unto you.

2b295 No.14509

half of a childs time in school should be spent apprenticing in actual workplaces.

69f5d No.14529

File: 1653173949315-0.jpg (95.03 KB, 640x735, joseph-goebbels-1393155.jpg)

File: 1653173949315-1.jpg (51.85 KB, 850x400, unz.jpg)

intellectuals are not only worthless but they believe they have value, making them damaging to society



File: 1652992275313.png (788.88 KB, 1080x1318, 1652991535521.png)

da4df No.14150[Reply]

I know a lot of frens in here try to forget that the troons and their jew overlords are sexualizing our children, but we have a serious problem to solve. First it appeared to be about gender identity but we all suspected the end game. Now it's confirmed, the begininning of normalizing pedophilia has begun. Here's how they'll do it:

NYT article exclaiming that "puberty is starting sooner."

Push this new scientific breakthrough down our throats for a while and then they'll lower age of consent. How can that be allowed you ask? Easy, because people (children) are "maturing faster" now.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/science/early-puberty-medical-reason.html
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

ef4da No.14158

>>14153
>as for the article it's stating a scientific fact.
This phenomenon of girls developing breasts at a younger age is most likely due to high-estrogen food products like soy.

f69c4 No.14187

>>14150
Cunny brides

66dc2 No.14528

>>14158
>phenomenon of girls developing breasts at a younger age is most likely due to high-estrogen food products like soy.
That is almost certainly a primary cause.
Long *known* causes of earlier puberty in females: obesity, molestation, absence of father.
It's no more "unknown" than what causes cancer; ALL of globohomo govcorp products do.



File: 1653097463315.jpg (126.2 KB, 1080x997, Screenshot_20220520-214346….jpg)

9bcdf No.14372[Reply]

Two corrupt companies (with ties to the Clinton's) were in rocky financial turmoil a few weeks ago. Now, with concerns over a global monkeypox outbreak being hyped by media and globohomo, the worries and sins of these two firms are quickly being forgotten. Shares are rising rapidly now for both Emergent Biosolutions and SIGA Technologies.


Expect to see the rhetoric ramp up around monkeypox in the coming weeks being the potential “next pandemic”.

Monkeypox will be used as the latest excuse to further advance draconian biosecurity policies and global power grabs, while making the rich and our corrupt elected officials even richer.

Source: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/05/investigative-reports/monkeypox-fears-may-rescue-endangered-corporations/

Who stands to gain the most financially from not only another pandemic but monkeypoxspecifically? We must follow the money frens. Report any findings you come across here in this thread. Source above is a good place to start.

a6d9c No.14525

File: 1653170973083.jpg (71.85 KB, 738x532, IMG_20220521_180639_827.jpg)




File: 1649521000187.gif (245.35 KB, 328x526, 20.gif)

a4b3b No.1000[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

humor time
183 posts and 155 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

4d7af No.14522

File: 1653170213570.mp4 (7.55 MB, 942x1280, VID_20220521_175558_520.mp4)


4d7af No.14523

File: 1653170277385.jpg (204.06 KB, 1280x1171, IMG_20220521_175510_408.jpg)


4d7af No.14524

File: 1653170690301.jpg (218.08 KB, 1080x1371, Screenshot_20220521-180334….jpg)




Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28]
| Catalog
[ home ] [ 0sint / art / b / biz / ck / coz / fc / fit / g / h / his / int / k / lit / pol / qa / r / sh / sig / t / tardpol / tv / v / x ] [ overboard ] [ donate ] [ rules ] [ privacy ] [ dmca ] [ status ]
Donate